Pages 18-19 in E.A. Spiecer's Anchor Bible Genesis there were references that lead me to an obscure article written just before the turn of the 20th century and publish in the 1913 edition of the Encyclopedia Judaica. The author was Professor Julius Oppert (1825-1905) a French-Jewish Assyriologist who was born in Germany but was naturalized as a French citizen in recognition of his services during an 1851 archaeologist expedition to Mesopotamia.

In 1857 he was appointed professor of Sanskrit and comparative philology in the school of languages connected to the Bibliotheque Nationale (National Library of France). He was fluent in English, French, German, Sanskrit and the language of the Sumerians. Oppert’s influence on Semitic scholarship was profound and in 1881 he became a member of Academie des Inscriptions et des Belles-Lettres and in 1891 became president of the Academy. Professor Oppert became a renowned authority in Assyrian culture and the decipherment of Sumerian cuneiform tablets. He noted, as did E.A. Speiser, that there is a parallel between the story of creation in the Bible and the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh. On page 42 of The Anchor Bible Book of Genesis E.A., Speiser states:

  “It is suggestive at any rate that the biblical account of the ark (of Noah) landed on a peak in the Ararat range, whereas the Akkadian version has it grounded on Mount Nisir, in the vicinity of modern Sulaimaniya. Armenia had various connections with the Hurrians, and the Hurrians had intimate contacts with the Hebrews. On this roundabout reasoning, the Hurrians could have served as intermediaries in the transmission of the antediluvian lists to biblical chroniclers.”

If the Biblical Patriarch List was derived from the Babylonian Kings list then the problem doesn’t get simpler as the Kings list ranges in the tens of thousands of years from 10,800 to 64,800 years versus Patriarch lifetimes of less than 1,000 years in the Genesis version. No king or dynasty has ever lasted tens of thousands of years.

The Biblical story of the flood of Noah has much in common with the Sumerian version except with the account of the time that transpired from the creation of the universe to the universal flood of Noah. Professor Oppert determined that that those involved in writing the Genesis version, or those that may have edited it at a later date, reduced the time frame of the Babylonian version to match what they felt matched their perceived genealogical history. Professor Oppert’s calculations are somewhat difficult to follow but may be reviewed in their entirety on pages 67-69 of the 1913 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia.

  According to Professor Oppert the Babylonians assumed a sexagesimal unit of measure base on 60 rather than our decimal system based on 10; however, our reckoning of time and measurement of angles are all based on Sumerian concepts. 60 seconds, 60 minutes and 360 degrees in a circle, etc.

Quoting Professor Oppert’s article:

“The Chaldeans admitted the eternity of the world without any beginning; but the existing astronomical bodies had a commencement. From the creation of these astronomical bodies to the great cataclysm, or the Deluge (Noah’s Flood), they assumed a sexagesimal unit, the number of the seconds in a day; that is, 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 24 hours = 86,400 seconds, and called it a lustra. The unit of the Babylonian school was 60 months, or 5 years, times the seconds in a day       (a lustra); that is, 432,000 years (86,400 x 5 = 432,000).”

The Hebrew scribes took the 86,400 years of the Babylonians and divided it by the number of weeks in a year; that is, 86,400 / 52.1739 weeks in a year according to their reckoning and came up with 1,656 years. They then divided the 1,656 years into 72 periods of 23 years or 1,200 weeks; apparently they did this reduction so that the time frame would match their genealogical legends. Professor Oppert determined that the Patriarch list was calculated as follows:

 Adam to Jared 130+105+90+70+65              = 460 x 86,400 / 1656 = 24,000 weeks

Mahalalel to Methuselah 162+65+187            = 414 x 86,400 / 1656 = 21,600 weeks

Lamech to Noah 182 + 600                             = 782 x 86,400 / 1656 = 40,800 weeks

Total 1,656 years                                             = 86,400 weeks

A simpler way to see the calculation is to take 24,000 Babylonian weeks in the first line and divide by the weeks in a year (52.1739) to arrive at 460 years. Professor Oppert goes on to state: “The corresponding Babylonian figures relating to the ten antediluvian Sumerian kings are:

The first three together                               =   93,600 years = 18,720 lustra
The following two together                          = 108,000 years = 21,600 lustra
 The remaining five                                      = 230,400 years = 46,080 lustra
                            Totals                                  432,000 years = 86,400 lustra

            The Bible (Genesis) has  ------------------------     86,400 Weeks
             The Chaldean texts have ------------------------    86,400 Lustra
      What legends the Hebrew and Chaldean authors used in apportioning the years assigned to each of the Hebrew patriarchs and the Chaldean kings appears now to be lost to history.

E.A. Speiser made a cryptic remark in one of his writings indicating that he believed the Babylonian figure of 432,000 years came from a source further to the east of Samaria. Oppertagrees and assigns the origin of the Hebrew and Chaldean chronology to the oldest extant religious text that of the Hindus. The figure 432,000 years is the length of the present age in Hinduism; that is, the Kali Yuga. There are four ages in Hinduism.

                                    Krta Yuga         =  1,728,000 years

                                    Treta Yuga       =  1,296,000 years

                                    Dvapara Yuga   =     864,000 years

                                    Kali Yuga         =     432,000 years

                                    MahaYuga          =  4,320,000 years

     The Hindu text appears to record time in eras just like modern science breaks the history of the earth into eras from the Hadean to the present Pleistocene. It may be that the Kings in the Sumerian text are not Kings and the Prophets in the Biblical text are not human beings but geological ages.

   In the Hindu religion Brahma is the Allah of Islam, the God of Christianity and the Yahweh of Judaism. Brahma is the creator of the universe and one Maha Yuga x 1,000 equals one day of Brahma or 4,320,000,000 years. It is interesting that this length of time nearly matches the age of the earth as determined by modern science or perhaps indicates when the precursors of life first began to form shortly after the formation of the earth at 4.5 to 4.6 billion years ago.

A day and night for Brahma is 4,320,000,000 x 2 or 8,640,000,000 human years. A year of Brahma is 8,640,000,000 human years x 360 days in a Hindu year or 3,110,400,000,000; that is, three trillion one hundred and ten billion four hundred million years. The life time of Brahma is 100 of these years or 311,040,000,000,000 years; that is, 311.04 trillion years or a Maha Kalpa.

According to the Hindu text at the end of this time the universe is no more. At the end of this vast age Brahma does not die in the usual sense; rather Brahma rests and after a period of time, some say 100 million years, Brahma thinks a thought and the creative cycle begins once again as it has in the past and will in the future. Interestingly the latest concepts of how the universe began involve the collision of ’branes’, vast entities of immense size that set off a Big Bang and the creation of matter and energy. These collisions occur periodically over vast stretches of time and appear to have been doing so for an incalculable number of times and will continue to do so for an incalculable number of times in the future and seem to agree with the Hindu version of creation. The number of times this has occurred is a number beyond our ability to calculate except to use the words “an infinite number of times”.

Skeptics have posed the question “If God made the universe well then who made God?” Brahma, like the God of the Christians, Hebrews and Muslims, has no beginning and no end and is eternal.  As sentient humans we are aware that we have a beginning and an eventual end. Mountains will arise and eventually they will erode away; our sun will eventually become a red giant in about 5 billion years and then become a dead cinder and eventually all the stars will exhaust their fuel and become dark. In some vast age the universe itself will finally become vacant and dark. Creationists claim that the end times are near. Well, don’t hold your breath or cash in your investments just yet as according to the Rig Veda the end times are some 311 trillion plus years in the future. According to science this is in the time frame of when all the stars will have burnt out and the universe will be a cold and dark place. In science it is the time well beyond 100 trillion years in the epoch of heat death referred to as the ‘Big Freeze’. Interesting how the ancients came up with these immense numbers that just happen to agree with modern science.

To our understanding everything has a beginning and an end. We find it near impossible to imagine something that never had a beginning and will never have an end. Perhaps God is something beyond space and time. It is interesting to note that these ancient texts were written in an age of scientific ignorance and evoke the question of how could these ancients have arrive at lengths of time that approximate modern scientific findings. There are those that will undoubtedly object to a connection between ancient Hindu texts and the Biblical book of Genesis. Rather than object they should realize that the connection from Hinduism to the Chaldean and then to the Hebrew is a confirmation of the validity of Genesis as a record of evolution and not a myth. Even so there will be those that will resist accepting any association between the Bible and other religions. It is human arrogance, ignorance and bigotry that posit that their religion is the only true religion and reject the possibility that other religions, other cultures, may contain truths. Perhaps in time they will consider that a supreme intelligence would not favor any of its creations more than another anymore than a human mother or father would favor one child to the neglect of the rest. Each civilization received the word, recorded it in a manner compatible with their culture. If we read about other religions and look for things that are common we may see common threads. The Rule of Reciprocity is an example as it occurs in virtually every religion on earth. Once again log on to the website and consider that these rules constitute the very foundation of all religions.

It is of interest that many have predicted the end of the world as we know it and have been proven wrong. Mark 13, particularly verses 31 & 32 clearly state that no one knows when the end will come. Log on to this site for a list of dates predicted for apocalyptic events....

 3 - Noah’s Ark and the Flood

Was there a worldwide flood of Noah as described in Genesis chapters 6 through 8? According to creationists a literal reading of the Biblical text clearly indicates there was a world-wide flood, an ark constructed of some sort of wood and similar in design to photo #1. The first clue that the literal reading of the text is misleading is found in Genesis 6:7 where God is destroying all life on earth. That would include little children and infants and place God in the gutter with all the murderous tyrants of human history. Why would the author attribute the cause of the flood to God? In the era that the flood took place it was commonly assumed that if there was a natural disaster it was God, or the Gods, punishing humanity for some transgression. The Bible however provides clues that there was no world-wide flood and there are experiments anyone can conduct that will demonstrate that this is so. Experiments that could have been conducted at any time during the last three thousand years.

Was there a world-wide flood?

In Genesis 8:11 the dove that Noah sent out returned with a fresh Olive leaf. If the Olive tree had been completely submerged under water, as Genesis 7:20 states, and for five months as Genesis 7:11 and 8:4 claim, the tree would be dead and leafless. Any arborist or olive orchard operator can testify to that fact. The following three experiments will demonstrate that the flood was not world-wide.

Experiment One – The Olive Tree

  I purchased a small five foot olive tree from a local nursery, placed it in a burlap sack with two bricks on the bottom for weight, secure the top of the sack around the truck of the olive tree and attached a cord to facilitate lowering and raising the tree. The olive tree was completely submerged in my swimming pool and left there for not five months but three. The first month nothing seemed to be happening. The second month leaves began to appear on the bottom of the pool. At the end ofthe third month the tree was leafless. The tree was then raised from the pool and planted in potting soil and cared for. After a month a gentle flexing of the outer branches caused them to snap off. At the end of another month the truck snapped off. The tree was not only leafless but dead. The dove therefore could only have returned with a leaf from an olive tree that had never been underwater and thus there was no world-wide flood and God did not cause the death of anyone. See photos 2 - 3.

Experiment Two – What would the herbivores eat once they left the Ark?

Obtain a small aquarium, or other suitable deep container, a plastic planter pan and several square feet of grass sod. Place grass sod in both the aquarium and the planter tray and cover the aquarium with window screen to prevent mosquitoes from breeding. Water both for a month to insure that the grass is growing and healthy. At the end of the month add water to the aquarium and completely submerge the grass. In one month’s time syphon off the water in the aquarium. What is left is yellow stinking inedible goo. See photos 4 & 5.

 Experiment Three – Noah’s Vineyard

 After the flood Noah is said to have planted a vineyard. If so the vines would have been planted in soil that was saturated with salty sea water. Obtain a second plastic planter tray, clean the existing one and obtain a bag of potting soil and a variety of seeds. I used barley, oats, rye and wheat seed obtained from Peaceful Valley Farm & Garden Supply. Fill each tray with potting soil. Label one "water" and water the soil well with plain water. In the other mix up a salt water solution by filling a one gallon milk jug half full with plain water and adding salt water from the ocean making a half and half solution. If ocean water is not readily available then make up a solution of salt water by adding 2.33 ounces of common table salt to a gallon of water and use this in lieu of ocean water. If you do not have a scale then measure out a little more than 4 1/2 level tablespoons of common table salt per gallon of water. If you use sea salt or rock salt grind it to a powder first. This produces a salt solution equal to that of the ocean water. Creationists will falsely insist that the ocean was less salty in ancient times or that the flood water did not contain salt. They have yet to explain why there are 71 trillion tons of salt 1,200 feet under southeast Michigan and still larger deposits in the Midwest. Water the soil in the second tray with the half plain water and salt water solution and label the tray Salt Water. Next create four furloughs in each tray. Plant a variety seeds in every row and lightly cover with soil and place in a location where the trays will receive sunlight. Water both lightly if the soil begins to dry out. In about seven days green growth will emerge from the tray with plain water. Nothing will emerge from the salt water tray. Grape vines are especially sensitive to salt water and Noah would not be able to grow grapes as stated in Genesis 9:20, or any grain crops, with soil saturated with salt. Further proof that there was no world-wide flood. (See photo 6)

There is a potential fourth experiment involving placing meat outdoors exposed to the air. Anyone should know that in short order that any flesh under the sea would be consumed by scavengers and flesh on land by maggots and nothing would be left for the carnivore other than bones.

Was there a local flood?

According to Genesis 7:11 and 8:14 the flood lasted 12 months and 10 days. That is an unusually long time for a river flood but it does match the flood caused when the Mediterranean Sea broke through at the mouth of the Bosporus and flooded the Black Sea creating a massive water fall some two miles in width and four hundred feet high and caused the shore of the Black Sea to advance on average at the rate of a thousand feet a day as described in the book ‘Noah’s Flood’3. Such a flood would have been terrifying to those in the area causing them to flee. If Noah had drifted far out into the Black Sea, and eventually lost sight of land, by his reckoning the whole world must be underwater. In the ancient world natural disasters were typically considered brought on by God as punishment for some misdeed and would lead Noah to believe the world had been destroyed by God.

Translation once again causes problems. The King James Bible says that the mountains were covered by water (Genesis 7:20). But the Hebrew word ‘har’ may also mean hill. The King James also infers that the flood was over the entire earth (Genesis 7:17-21) whereas erets can also mean country or a very large expanse of land but not the entire earth.

Was there a Noah’s Ark?

  Genesis 6:14 states that the Ark of Noah was constructed of Gopherwood but Hebrew scholars and theologians can’t agree on what type of wood it is. Perhaps they should consider gopherwood to be a Hebrew phonetic version of the Sumerian word ‘gaffa’ meaning a reed coracle that was coated with pitch just like the ark. The Sumerian story of Enu Elish, from which much of the Noah story is derived, clearly states “Wall, wall. Tear down this wall of reeds and build an ark”. Using only the primitive stone and wood tools available at the time, tools made of iron not being available for another 800 years, a wooden ship 450 feet long by 75 feet wide and a height of 45 feet would require a king’s ransom in funding and an army of workmen to complete. What Noah most likely constructed was what is referred to as a ‘Kelak’, a reed raft. Such a raft could easily be constructed by eight people using only local materials found near the Black Sea. Noah most likely also had a ‘Tarada’, a reed canoe or a Guffa coracle for fishing. A reed raft could easily be built by eight people using only flakes of obsidian, a form of volcanic glass. Most likely the ark would have been constructed of bundles of reeds stacked together to form a raft and may have looked somewhat similar to the reed Mudhifs of the Marsh Arabs of southern Iraq. Such a vessel would flex in rough seas versus a rigid wooden vessel could break in half in rough weather. The S.S. Wyoming was a wooden ship similar in size to the Ark and it leaked so bad that a steam pump had to be installed to keep it from sinking.  (See photos 7 – 9)

Did Animals Arrive from all over the World?

Creationist do not give a reasonable explanation of how  animals from all over the world somehow manage to navigate oceans, deserts and mountain ranges and find Noah’s ark? They have no rational explanation of how Pandas found the special bamboo along the way that they require or Koalas the eucalyptus leaves they require. How did Noah store the ants and termites that Anteaters require? Strange that Noah’s says nothing about any exotic animals that he has never seen. Could it be that he didn’t find it necessary to describe the animals as they were his livestock? In addition to the some 24,000 animals Noah would have to board and care for he would have to travel all over the world and collected 360,000 species of trees and plants and in addition around a million insectspecies. (See exhibit 10)

Then there is the matter of the man-hours required to feed and water the animals and plants. Any major zoo can provide information on the number of animals they have and the number of people that are directly involved in their care8. Simple math will show that the man-hours each of the eight humans aboard the ark would have to work to feed, water and care for the animals, trees, plants and insects far outstrips the hours in a day by a very large factor.

            It should be obvious that the story was based on a real event and that there was not a world-wide flood and thus God did not commit mass murder.



2) Detroit Salt Mine,


3) Noah’s Flood by William Ryan and Walter Pitman Touchstone


5) Tablet XI, Column 1 of the Epic of Gilgamesh by John Gardner & John Maier.




Photo 7 - A Gaffa Coracle Fashioned of Reeds and Coated with Pitch


Photo 9 - Interior of a Marsh Arab Mudhif

Photo 4 - Grass Sod on Day One

​​1 - The Genesis Creation Story

The Instant of Creation

            According to the opening verses of Genesis –
1) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2) The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.

When the Big Bang is portrayed on television it is shown as a brilliant flash of light and a thunderous roar; a completely false image. Although the temperature of the universe in the beginning was in the trillions of degrees Fahrenheit no light was visible and darkness prevailed and there was no air to transmit sound. The universe was indeed formless as no atoms had yet formed due to the extreme temperature, there being only a soup of extremely hot fundamental particles. The King James Bible incorrectly translates the last verse as “And the spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.”  The verse should read ‘—and only an awesome wind sweeping over the waters.1” Indeed there was what appeared to the author to be an awesome wind due to the rapid expansion of the nascent universe. Light did finally separate from darkness, as verse 4 states, but not in one day but during the epoch of ‘reionization’ at 380,000 years after the Big Bang. Only four verses into the story and science and the Bible are in accord.

The fifth verse gives instructions on how the author reckoned time by the appearance of light and its subsequent disappearance. Each occurrence of light emerging and then disappearing marks a major epoch in the evolution of the universe. The first light that appeared in the universe at 380,000 years after the Big Bang eventual faded as the universe continued to expand and cool and the universe entered what science refers to as the Dark Age. See photo 3.

The sixth verse “Let there be an expanse in the middle of the water to form a division between the waters.” Appears to be the author’s way of describing the accretion of gases and the formation of stars. This occurred about 400 million years after the Big Bang and light appeared again in the universe as the first stars ignited. Eventually the distance between the new stars increased to a point where darkness once again ruled and thus the second day.

Subsequent verses tell of the appearance of ‘—plants that bear seed, and every kind of fruit tree on earth that bears fruit with its seed in it.” In these verses it appears that the author is placing trees long before the appearance of life in the sea. Ginkgo’s are believed to be the first seed bearing plants and they appeared around 276 million years ago, fruit bearing plants arrived somewhere between 120-190 million years ago and grass surprisingly appeared only about 55-60 million years ago. In the early seas there was microscopic plant life and some did indeed appear to be like trees and some had nodules that made them appear to be bearing fruit. This early primitive life may well have evolved before the sun ignited. Such life forms were chemotrophs that utilized heat rather than sunlight to manufacture the complex organic compounds necessary to sustain themselves. Finally the sun ignited ushering in what the ancient author calls “day four”. Subsequent verses have the evolution of life in the proper order; life in the sea and then life on land. Critics have claimed that birds evolved only in the late Triassic long after land animals appeared in the late Devonian. What the author may have mistaken for birds (Genesis 1:20-21) were giant dragon flies with three foot wing spans such as the Meganeuropis Permiana1 that first appeared in the early Devonian.

Genesis 2:7 states that “God Yahweh formed man from clods in the soil.” Clods are suggestive of a clay like material and science believes that life formed in the interstices of Montmorillonite clay; a clay that has the property of holding molecules together that normally would break apart.

“After their kind—“

 Creationists claim that Genesis 1:21, 24 & 25 exclude the possibility of evolution when they state “according to its kind.”  This is a mistranslation of the text as both the Torah in English and the Anchor Bible use the terms “of every kind—“and “various kinds—“ thus allowing for evolution.

The Garden of Eden

​     The Genesis story of Adam and Eve, if taken literally, has God leaving his new creations in the presence of a devious serpent and with access to deadly fruit. Both of them being naive, God having not seen fit to instruct them as to what is good and what is evil, nor warning them not to trust the serpent, they listen to the serpent’s advice and partake of the forbidden fruit. Upon returning God finds them dying and does the unthinkable and casts his soiled creations out of Eden. Even more inexplicable God does not take steps to sterilize them to stop them from breeding and creating more flawed humans. According to traditional interpretation we present day humans are to suffer for the disobedience of Adam and Eve. The idea that we, who were born long after the time of Adam and Eve, are to suffer for their misdeeds doesn’t make any sense. However, if a genetic mutation was involved then the story begins to make sense. Could it be that the serpent is actually coiled RNA inserting a fragment of genetic material, the forbidden fruit, into a cell’s DNA and thus causing a mutation that gave rise to a life form that was capable of what the author would call ‘sin’? If this hypothesis is correct then the logical place to conduct a search for possible clues would be the human cell and it’s DNA.

     According to Genesis 2:7 God created Adam from ‘---clods in the soil---“1 but creates Eve from one of Adam’s ribs Genesis 2:21. Why didn’t God simply use clods of soil to create Eve? The answer came while searching the internet.  I came across a chart of the human chromosomes all aligned and they looked like the rib cage of a serpent. Further on I encountered a chart that demonstrated the difference between the female and male chromosomes. Surprisingly the male 23rd chromosome has one of its chromosomes deformed and the ancient author might well describe it as a missing rib (see photo 1). This missing rib heralded a major change in life on earth. The first life forms were primitive Prokaryote cells that reproduced by dividing through mitosis forming two identical cells. These cells were quasi-immortal in that they continually divided rather than grow old and die. Adam and Eve apparently were also immortal until they ate of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. At some point far back in time a genetic mutation took place that changed the benign, non-sentient Prokaryote life form into a Eukaryote life form that employed meiosis that produced non-identical life forms and thus death. Sexual reproduction appeared and created unique life forms that would eventually lead to sentient life forms that could control their own actions and thus introduced the potential for good or evil. Is this what the author is trying to explain with his limited ability? Of interest to the ladies, who have been charged as the cause of the fall of man, the original asexual cells, from which a rib was taken, had all their chromosomes intact and therefore it was technically a female that gave rise to the male when one of her chromosomes was modified. Eve was first, not Adam, something that the patriarchal society of the author’s time would never accept.

     After God expelled Adam and Eve from Eden he placed a flaming sword that guarded the way to Eden. There is a ‘flaming sword swaying back and forth’ preventing Adam and Eve from returning to their paradise; that sword is the Micro tubular Spindle Fibers (see photo 2) in the cell’s nucleus and indeed it does sway back and forth and prevents the chromosomes from retreating to their former condition at the time of cell division. The missing rib and the Spindle Fibers are microscopic and would not be discovered until the 20th century; how then is it possible that the ancient author was able to describe them?


1)  Genesis, The Anchor Bible, E.A. Speiser


Would it be possible for humans to live to an extra ordinary age? Consider the following that is an extract from the 2000 United States Census of Deaths and Death Rates, by Age and Leading Cause found at: 

 The following abstract covers men only, all ages and races as of 1995. I have omitted all death caused by disease and included death by accident and suicide and motor vehicles. Obviously there were no motor vehicles thousands of years ago but there was significant death through warfare and murder and I have allowed death by motor vehicle to act as a stand in for warfare and murder.

Photo 8 - Mudhif on the Marsh Arabs of Southern Iraq

Photo 2 - A Depiction of Spindle Fibers. The Flaming Sword of Genesis 3:24 

​​​​​4 - Why does the controversy continue?

    For more than a century and a half after the publication of Charles Darwin’s “The Origin of Species’ a controversy has raged between the scientific account of creation and the creationist version based on a literal reading of Genesis. These excerpts from the book ‘The Evolution of Genesis the Commonsense Biblical Interpretation’ Amazon Books presents a rational interpretation of Biblical text that is supported by modern science and provides a rational alternative to the mythical creationist interpretation of Genesis. Pay particular attention to the three experiments presented in Noah's Ark and the Flood as they will demonstrate the flaws in creationist claims.
Relax. Your Bible is safe and only requires a commonsense interpretation
     Why do we still have this controversy between evolution and creationism? What is it that drives creationists to advocate their views when so much scientific evidence refutes them? There are five major factors to be considered:

1) Jesus never mentions a word concerning the Genesis creation story. If Jesus didn’t find it necessary to mention it then why should any of the Christian faith be concerned?
The gospel of Jesus is not concerned with how or where we came from it is entirely about where we should be going and how to get there.

2) In 66 AD the Jewish population, fed up with Roman rule and taxation, revolted. Rome sent in legions of soldiers resulting in the destruction of the temple, the slaughter of the priesthood and destruction of copies of the Torah. Fortunately the Romans were not more thorough in their attempt to stamp out Judaism but suppose they had been. In the absence of the Old Testament the Christian religion would continue to function. Again why then all the concern over the Genesis creation story? Jesus stated clearly who he was, what his message was and that all have sinned and are in need of salvation.

3) Creationists insist that Biblical passages be read literally word for word as absolute truth. This stance ignores the fact that although the original information may have been from God its subsequent transmission was by humans and humans are not infallible. If Biblical text is taken literally then there are instances where one will be required to accept that God resorts to mass murder such as the Flood of Noah or the killing of

Egyptians in the Exodus stories and in other instances where God appears to act irrationally and to be incompetent. God has never caused the death of anyone and God certainly is not irrational or incompetent.

 4) The misconception that if one accepts evolution then one must abandon the creation story of Genesis and thus bring the validity of the entire Bible into question and perhaps lose ones faith ignoring the fact that are many evolutionists who are people of faith.

The formula for an average life expectancy ( E ) is:

E = Ln(0.5) / Ln (1-Death Rate / 100,000)
            Ln stands for Natural Logarithm and can be calculated on most hand calculators.

Accidents------------------------------------------------------------  47.9 per 100,000  
Motor-vehicle, standing in for Warfare and Murder --------22.7 per 100,000
Suicide --------------------------------------------------------------- 19.8  per 100,000                               
From the chart the Death Rate is:       90.4                                                      

The equation then becomes:  E = Ln(0.5) / Ln (1- 90.4/100,000) or
E = Ln(0.5) / Ln (1-0.000904)  =  Ln (0.5) / Ln (0.999096)
E = -0.693147181 / - 0.000904409 = about 766 1/2 years.

This places life expectancy below the range given in Genesis. However, this is based on the assumption that all disease has been eliminated and that there has been a drastic reduction
in the aging process. There is absolutely no credible evidence that such conditions have ever existed. If creationists insist on making the claim that humans lived to hundreds of years old in the past then they must provide physical evidence and this they has consistently failed to do. 
  The Patriarch List of the Bible lists ten patriarchs and the Kings List, as recorded in Sumerian cuneiform tablets, as described by Berossus,  priest of Bel Marduk and a historian of Babylonia who lived sometime between 356 BC-261 BC, lists ten kings. Some Biblical commentators declare that the Sumerian King’s list Table 3 - was based on the Hebrew Patriarch’s list as found in Genesis chapter 5. Assyriologists soundly disagree and place the age of the Sumerian Kings List as predating the Patriarchs list by a few hundred years if not in an even more remote time. If the Hebrew list was derived from the Sumerian list then why doesn’t it agree? My speculation is the Hebrews had an oral genealogy that went back only a few thousand years and they reduced the Sumerian to match theirs. If so then how did they do this?

Photo 1 - The Traditional Depiction of Noah's Ark

2 - The Age of the Patriarch's Problem

Of all the arguments Creationists put forth for a young age of the earth none is more exacting than the Patriarch’s list as found in Genesis chapter 5 verses 1-27. The listing begins with Adam and continues to Noah at the time of the flood and totals 1,656 years. Using this time line, and the genealogies in subsequent chapters, Bishop Ussher determined that creation began in the year 4004 BC making the earth presently a little more than 6,000 years old. This timeline has been accepted as factual for generations by biblical literalists. According to Bishop James Ussher (1581-1656), the Archbishop of Ramah and Primate of all Ireland, in his tome “The Annals of the World iv (1650), creation of the universe began on Sunday the 23rd day of the Julian calendar October, 4004 BC. The full text of how Bishop Ussher derived this time is rather involved and not germane to this book and may be found at:  

    Dr. John Lightfoot, Vice Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, a renowned Hebrew scholar deduced from Ussher’s work that creation actually started during 3929 BC. He is erroneously quoted as saying that creation began at 9 AM. Other scholars determined different dates for the beginning of creation. Saint Bede (672 AD-735 AD) 3952 BC, Johannes Kepler (1571 AD-1630 AD) 3992 BC, Rabbi Jose Ben Calafat (1st or 2nd century AD) 376
1 BC, and Sir Isaac Newton (1643 AD-1727 AD) circa 4000 BC. Regardless of whose dating is accepted Young Earth creationists believe they have solid evidence that the universe and the earth are less than 10,000 years old.

Table 1 - Lists the age of each of the Pre-Flood Patriarchs at the time of their death and their age at the time of the birth of their successor. Even Enoch, the youngest of the Patriarchs lived to an age more than three times the age of the oldest known human being for which there is a reliable record. Regardless of which figure is accepted it would seem to clearly state that the universe and the earth are less than 10,000 years old. This seems to present an obstacle impossible to overcome.

Some have suggested that maybe the age of the Patriarchs was originally expressed in months rather than years. If this is the case then the ages would reduce to those in Table 2. If this is true then the life spans of the pre-flood patriarchs make sense but the age at which they sired sons, makes no sense at all as this would require them to sire children while they themselves were but children and in some cases less than six years old. Where then does the answer to this dilemma lie?

Skeptics point out that the Genesis genealogy must be a fabrication as it has humans ranging in life spans of 365 years for Enoch to 969 years for Methuselah; life spans far exceeding the oldest age for any human that there is any reliable evidence for. All evidence strongly indicates that average life expectancy has been rising and not descending as literalists contend. 5,000 years ago the average life span was less than 35 years. Little more than 100 years ago the human life span was not much better than 45 years with a high mortality rate for children; about half the children failing to reach adulthood. Only in the last century did medical science progress to the point where life expectancy began to rise to the present level of nearly 80 years. It is of interest that the Bible, Genesis 6:3, claims that the maximum age of humans will be 120 years. Not long ago the only human with a verifiable record lived just a short time past 120 years. All other record holders for old age have lived on average about 114 years.

In order for humans to attain the advanced ages described by the Patriarch’s list they would have to be immune to all disease and to have dramatically slowed the aging process; two steps that modern science has yet to achieve. Thousands of years ago living conditions were unsanitary, diseases were rampant, medical knowledge was primitive, if non-existent, there was death from starvation caused by crop failure and/or depletion of game, polluted water, warfare and civil strife all contributed to a short life expectancy. No skeletal remains have ever been found that indicate an age at death much beyond 100 years. Commonsense indicates that in the absence of evidence of extraordinarily long life spans something is amiss.